Prediction of Justine Ozga vs Qian Nan Feng Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
J. Ozga vs Q. Nan Feng

Justine Ozga

GER

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

259

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$3.1K

Career Money

Plays

Qian Nan Feng

CHN

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

259

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$3.1K

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Ozga 1 - 0 Feng

They have played 2 sets in total, with Justine Ozga winning 2 and Qian Nan Feng winning 0. The last match between Justine Ozga and Qian Nan Feng was at the Nules, 17-11-2014, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Justine Ozga getting the victory 6-3 6-2.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Ozga	1
Feng	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1) Nules(11-17-14)

Stats

Justine Ozga

Qian Nan Feng

J. Ozga vs Q. N. Feng H2H Profile

J. Ozga	Stats	Q. N. Feng
$3,091	Career Prize Money	$0
51.67% (248-232)	Career Total W/L	26.79% (15-41)
1	Clay	0
2	Titles	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

J. Ozga vs Q. N. Feng Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Justine Ozga has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Qian Nan Feng has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Justine Ozga, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Qian Nan Feng has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Justine Ozga has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Qian Nan Feng has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Justine Ozga has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Qian Nan Feng winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Justine Ozga has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 58/43), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 49% (W/L 41/43). Qian Nan Feng has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 8/17), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 24% (W/L 7/22).
Player level: In the last year, Justine Ozga has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Qian Nan Feng has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Justine Ozga winning 1 times and Qian Nan Feng being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Justine Ozga winning 2 and Qian Nan Feng winning 0.
The last match between Justine Ozga and Qian Nan Feng was at the Nules, 17-11-2014, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Justine Ozga getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Justine Ozga has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Qian Nan Feng has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Justine Ozga has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Qian Nan Feng has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Justine Ozga has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Qian Nan Feng has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Justine Ozga vs Qian Nan Feng Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

J. Ozga vs Q. N. Feng H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

J. Ozga	Stats	Q. N. Feng
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	5
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

J. Ozga Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Maaseik - 25-07-2016
R2 Bibiane SchoofsB. Schoofs	L	6-7(2) 6-4 6-3	Stats
R1 Steffi DistelmansS. Distelmans	W	6-0 6-1	Stats
Q1 Jaimy-Gayle Van De WalJ. Van	W	6-0 ret.	Stats
Q2 Schena BenamarS. Benamar	W	6-7(4) 1-2 ret.	Stats
Q3 Antje RubbrechtA. Rubbrecht	W	6-3 6-2	Stats

View All

Q. N. Feng Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Cairo - 10-12-2018
Q1 Yasmin EzzatY. Ezzat	L	6-1 6-2	Stats
Cairo - 03-12-2018
Q1 Anastasia PiangerelliA. Piangerelli	L	6-3 6-0	Stats
Vinaros - 05-11-2018
Q2 Irene GarceranI. Garceran	L	7-5 6-2	Stats
Q1 Laura Morera LucasL. Morera	W	6-3 6-2	Stats
Melilla - 24-09-2018
R2 Alexandra DamaschinA. Damaschin	L	6-2 6-2	Stats

View All

J. Ozga vs Q. N. Feng Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

J. Ozga	Stats	Q. N. Feng
51.99% (248/229)	YTD Win/Loss	26.79% (15/41)
51.77% (556/518)	Sets Win/Loss	30.58% (37/84)
51.05% (4963/4758)	Games Win/Loss	41.44% (431/609)
57.43% (58/43)	Hard Win/Loss	32.00% (8/17)
50.62% (123/120)	Clay Win/Loss	24.14% (7/22)
50.38% (67/66)	Indoor Hard W/L	0.00% (0/2)
0.01	Aces Per Game	0.01
25	Aces Total	5
0.02	Double Faults Per Game	0.08
85	Total Double Faults	40
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
559.96	Average Opponent Rank	301.46
66% (1001/1512)	1st Serve %	65% (451/691)
59% (593/1001)	1st Serve Win %	52% (233/451)
41% (209/511)	2nd Serve Win %	42% (101/240)
42% (83/199)	Break Points Won % (Total)	40% (31/77)
45% (715/1579)	Return Points Win %	42% (298/709)
0.00% (0/1)	Masters W/L	0% (0/0)
37.50% (6/10)	Main Tour W/L	0% (0/0)
47.97% (142/154)	Challenger W/L	0% (0/0)
60.98% (100/64)	Futures W/L	26.79% (15/41)
52% (242/467)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	27% (15/56)
0% (0/1)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/0)
55% (52/95)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	50% (2/4)
48% (61/128)	Deciding Set Win %	22% (2/9)
85% (250/213)	1st Set Won, Won Match	76% (17/13)
15% (250/37)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	24% (17/4)
15% (226/33)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	5% (39/2)